Official site — always check you are on kripicard.comVerify
SEO tools
Generate a valid robots.txt with as many user-agent groups as you need. Presets cover the common cases, and the tool warns you when a rule blocks more than you probably meant.
Blocks admin, cart and search pages — the usual thin or private areas.
* means every crawler that has no more specific group.
One path per line. Leave empty to allow everything.
Exceptions carved out of a Disallow. More specific rules win.
Ignored by Google. Bing and Yandex honour it.
One per line. Must be absolute URLs.
Only Yandex uses this. Safe to leave blank.
noindex meta tag.User-agent: *
Disallow: /admin/
Disallow: /cart
Disallow: /checkout
Disallow: /search
Disallow: /*?s=
Disallow: /api/
Sitemap: https://example.com/sitemap.xmlUpload to the root of your domain — it must be reachable at /robots.txt. A file in a subdirectory is ignored entirely.
Almost every robots.txt mistake traces back to one confusion. These are two separate systems and they are controlled by two different mechanisms.
| Goal | Correct tool | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Save crawl budget on junk URLs | robots.txt Disallow | Stops the fetch before it happens |
| Keep a page out of search results | noindex meta tag | Page must be crawlable for this to be read |
| Hide private data | Authentication | robots.txt is public and advertises the path |
| Consolidate duplicate URLs | rel=canonical | Blocking hides the duplicate signal instead of resolving it |
The third row deserves emphasis. robots.txt is world-readable at a predictable URL, so listing Disallow: /internal-admin-panel/ publishes the existence of that path to anyone curious enough to look. It is a signpost, not a lock.
No, and this is the single most costly misunderstanding in technical SEO. robots.txt controls crawling, not indexing. If other sites link to a blocked URL, Google can still list it — typically with no description, because it was never allowed to read the page. To keep something out of the index you must allow crawling and serve a noindex meta tag.
Exactly. The noindex tag lives in the page's HTML, and a crawler that is forbidden from fetching the page never sees it. Combining Disallow with noindex is self-defeating: pick one. If the page is already indexed, allow crawling until Google re-reads it and drops it, then block if you still want to.
The root of the host, at /robots.txt exactly. It applies per host and per protocol, so https://example.com and https://shop.example.com need separate files. A robots.txt in a subdirectory is ignored completely.
No. Google ignores Crawl-delay entirely; crawl rate is managed in Search Console. Bing and Yandex do honour it, so the directive is not useless — it just does nothing for the crawler most people are worried about.
You can block the ones that publish a user-agent and choose to obey robots.txt — GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, CCBot and PerplexityBot among them. Compliance is voluntary. Blocking here is a request, not an enforcement mechanism, and it does nothing against a scraper that ignores the file.
The most specific matching rule wins, judged by path length, not by the order the lines appear. Disallow: /wp-admin/ with Allow: /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php blocks the directory but keeps that one file reachable, because the Allow path is longer. If two rules are equally specific, the least restrictive wins.